Lowball Candidate for SCOTUS

Bush has nominated, for the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, someone with almost no judicial experience, John Roberts.

OK, so he has two years on the DC court of appeals, which is two more years than I have. How about this, I'll take the job at a 20% lower salary. But he went to Harvard. Well OK, but I went to UC, how about 30% off? I mean with the US debt held in only worthless paper (otherwise known as treasury bonds) you MUST be looking for a bargain, right?

Otherwise, why are you nominating someone with so little experience, when I could do the job for a fraction of the rate?